Are You Suffering from Sage on the Stage Syndrome??

Hello All,

I recently had two students working on independent projects that were not turning out quite the way they were expecting. I was especially delighted about one not working out so well.  It excited me to be able to respond that sometimes one can learn just as much or more from something not working as it should as something that works out perfectly.  Happily, I could have probably typed out two pages of many ‘great scientists’ who made a mistake that led to a discovery or who while working on one thing changed direction in order to address another issue with the unexpected way the research had gone. With that tucked away somewhere in my mind, the title “How to Learn? From Mistakes” caught my attention.  As Dianne Laufenberg shares in her talk, the reminder is there sometimes the greatest way to learn is through mistakes.  Students need to fail some. I could relate to information she presented regarding the educational system and where the access to information has been located over the years.   I had to admit I had grown up in a culture where the teacher was usually the sage on the stage, the great dispenser of knowledge.  As a teacher, I continue the battle of transitioning away from becoming a sage on the stage teacher to more of a teacher that guides students to do, find, and explore on their own...'guide on the side' seems to be the current catch phrase. I find for some students that have been in the system of the teacher as the great dispenser of information, this can be a challenging transition.  Other students, it seems to open up a wonderful freeing creative process. I too agree with the speaker that often when I allow students to generate their own projects with minimal guidelines, much of the work I receive exceeds what I would have received with an extremely detailed rubric and exemplar. Students simply sometimes use resources and applications I am not up on.  Not only is there ownership and learning of content knowledge for the student, I often am able to learn from my students as well. Let’s face it, there is so much available in our digital age, it is impossible to be a true sage anymore.  In the present journey, I rather be a part of a community of learners where we are all learning from one another than one where I am a potential limit to who those in my classroom can become.

Happy to share the stage,

Mrs. A

Science and Math Review with Study Jams

Hello all,

There do not seem to be many tools to support students with the general science MAPS test.  There seems to be numerous resources available to students to improve their reading, language, and math scores. Beyond the MAPs test, it's nice to find additional study resources to reinforce concepts that go along with the science curriculum or from time to find resources that refresh students' memories of past science topics. I have found Scholastic's Study Jams fulfills both purposes of curriculum support and concept review from past years. Study Jams are available for both science and math. Many of the science Study Jams feature a video or slide show followed by test yourself questions. The questions are scored at the end and the reasoning for the correct answers is revealed by looking at feedback for each question.   Study Jams seems to be geared toward the 5th-8th grade crowd.  I've especially found it beneficial for the 6th grade reinforcement of topics. The test yourself questions work well for team trivia battles.

Happy studies,

Mrs. A

On Standards

Hello All,

http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_A.pdf

I haven’t taken the time to sit down and read the Center on Education Policy’s Year 3 of Implementing the Common Core State Standards: An Overview of States’ Progress and Challenges.  I made a quick scan of the 20 page report after reading the article, Admins Predict Changes in Rigor, Instruction Under Common Core by Laura Devaney in eSchool News August 8, 2013 that referenced it.  While there is no ground breaking information in the article beyond the link to the report, it does remind me that the CCSS have a direct impact on science education.  After all, I have spent time tying CCSS into a unit plan with state standards and local learning targets.  The CCSS have me paying more attention to where and how colleagues work literacy into their content areas, not necessarily science.  I’ve been much more aware of the role literacy plays in my own preparations.  I cannot deny the changes in rigor seeing the increase in Lexile range for grade levels and the writing emphases.  Being associated with some that provide professional development, I’ve been able to hear about the challenges and progress being made in school districts in our state.  I realize my thoughts are focusing more on the Language Arts side of the Common Core State Standards; I appreciate and value math in science education as well. It seems the math side of science has had more attention with STEM in the news for many years.  As an educator, I am thankful there has been effort placed in referencing the Common Core State Standards in the Next Generation Science Standards as I expect there to be a push to align curriculum with NGSS over the next few years.  I have to admit including that information may make the transition to NGSS move along faster coming out so close to the implementation of CCSS.

Happy reading,

Mrs. A

Common Core State Standards and Readability

Hello All,

With the implementation of Common Core State Standards, it occurred to me secondary science teachers are likely thinking more about the readability of materials chosen for the classroom.  If you are not familiar with Lexiles or the changes in the Lexile ranges for grade bands, a great place to learn more is The Lexile Framework for Reading.  The site allows one to search for books by Lexile measure or grade level.  The title of a book can also be entered to find the Lexile measure if the information has been documented.  The site further provides the option of a Lexile Analyzer to find the Lexile measure of text from other sources.  Personally,  I prefer Readability-Score.com for analyzing text since I can simply copy and paste the text to be analyzed.  The Lexile Analyzer from the previous site requires one to format the text a certain way before submitting for analysis.  Readability-Score.com also evaluates the text according to a number of readability formulas along with providing text statistics such as words per sentence and sentence count.  Word and Outlook utilize the Flesch Reading Ease formula, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula, and text statistics to determine the readability of the text.  

Readability Statistics in Word

In both Word and Outlook, go to the Review tab, click on Spelling and Grammar, go to Options, and check the Show readability statistics box – may also need to check the Check grammar with spelling box in order for the Show readability statistics box to allow a check.  

Feel free to research the various readability tests further on your own.  There is plenty of debate in the areas of literacy, Lexile, other readability tests, and education within the United States.

Happy analysis,

Mrs. A